![]() |
Clinical Image
1 MBBS, Department of Surgery, Launceston General Hospital, Launceston, Tasmania, Australia
2 Medical Student, Launceston Medical School, Launceston, Tasmania, Australia
3 FRCS(Edin), FRACS, Department of Surgery, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
Address correspondence to:
Tedman Cheuk-Yiu Chau
MBBS, Department of Surgery, Launceston General Hospital, Launceston, Tasmania,
Australia
Message to Corresponding Author
Article ID: 100095Z12TC2021
No Abstract
Keywords: Appendiceal abscess, Hydronephrosis, Ureteric compression
Acute appendicitis is a common condition requiring emergency surgery where patients typically present with a triad of fever, abdominal pain, and vomiting. Severe cases can result in perforation of the appendix or abscess formation. Depending on the pathological and anatomical changes, this can have variable clinically presentations. Here, we present a rare complication of appendicitis with right hydronephrosis due to direct compression of the right ureter by an appendiceal abscess.
A 48-year-old lady was referred into to the emergency department with a 3-week history of gradually worsening lower abdominal pain associated with nausea, subjective fever, and appetite loss. She had no referable urinary tract symptoms or other systemic symptoms.
Her medical history was unremarkable but she does have a family history of Crohn’s disease and heavy smoking intake. On examination, the patient was afebrile and hemodynamically stable. There was voluntary abdominal tenderness and guarding in the right iliac fossa.
Laboratory workup revealed a normal white cell count, C-reactive protein (CRP) of 79 mg/L, and an acute kidney injury with creatinine rise to 90 umol/L and 65 mL/min/1.73 m2. Urine analysis was unremarkable. An abdominal computed tomography (CT) was performed and revealed a 45 mm fluid collection around the distal tip of the appendix (Figure 1). This collection abuts the right ovary and the right ureter, resulting in a ureteral obstruction and associated right sided hydronephrosis (Figure 2). Percutaneous drainage of this collection was not possible due to the anatomical location. Fluid resuscitation and broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotic therapy were initiated on admission. The patient was consented for a laparoscopic drainage procedure, with an understanding that open drainage may be required.
During the operation on the following day, laparoscopic drainage was abandoned due to poor safe access to the abscess and open drainage was achieved through a standard Lanz incision, and a drain was left in situ. No extensive attempt was taken to identify the obscured appendix. The patient recovered well post-operatively and was discharged home the following day with a course of oral antibiotic. The drain remained in situ, and the patient was followed up in the outpatient clinic.
A follow-up outpatient colonoscopy and a computed tomography of kidneys, ureters, and bladder (CT-KUB) were performed 1-month post-discharge. The CT-KUB showed good resolution of the appendiceal collection and hydronephrosis. The colonoscopy confirmed sigmoid diverticulosis, two benign polyps and no other abnormalities. Nonetheless, because the patient had complaints of on-going abdominal pain, she was taken back to operating theatre five weeks after the initial surgery for an interval laparoscopic appendectomy. The operation was uncomplicated, and histology of the appendix revealed no evidence of residual appendicitis. Lastly, a final ultrasound of the kidneys, ureters, and bladder (US-KUB) was performed three weeks later and showed complete resolution of the right hydronephrosis. Blood tests revealed baseline renal function. The patient was then discharged from surgical service.
Hydronephrosis secondary to appendicitis is rare and comprises only 3.5% of all cases of appendicitis [1],[2]. Most of these cases result from inflammation progression through the posterior parietal peritoneum resulting in segmental ureteral ileus, similar to bowel ileus seen with peritonitis [3]. Other rare causes include adhesions, uretero-appendiceal fistula, and appendicular actinomycosis [4]. Interestingly, despite the close proximity of the appendix to the right ureter, direct compression of the right ureter by an appendiceal abscess is rarely the isolated cause to this manifestation [5],[6],[7]. Here, we present a case with clear radiological evidence to demonstrate such a rare phenomenon.
Traditionally, complicated appendicitis with abscess formation is managed conservatively with broad spectrum antibiotics followed by an interval appendectomy [8]. This is because an immediate operation may be technically difficult due to distorted anatomy and extensive inflammation tissue. Drainage of abscess for source control, whether laparoscopic or percutaneous, may be considered and has some evidence showing an improved clinical outcome [9]. One clear advantage of such approach is the instant decompression of the right ureter and good resolution of the associated hydronephrosis, as demonstrated in this case. Nonetheless, due to the rarity of this occurrence, more data is needed to validate such a treatment approach.
Furthermore, conservative management of complicated appendicitis has risks of missing or delaying diagnosis of uncommon colonic diseases, such as malignancy or Crohn’s disease. For this reason, an outpatient CT scan and colonoscopy to exclude alternative differentials are usually warranted [9]. This management was particularly important in this case given a known family history of Crohn’s disease. In addition, these investigations also allow surgeons to monitor patient’s progress and plan a surgery if needed. Nonetheless, we believe such approach must be balanced with consideration of patient demographics to minimize unnecessary radiation, particular to younger people.
In summary, this case illustrates that appendiceal abscess may result in direct ureteral compression in rare circumstances, and timely drainage of such collection can result in good resolution of renal function. We agree that conservative management of the acutely inflamed appendix in such scenario is a reasonable approach given the technical difficulty of an emergent operation. However, if one chooses to adopt such method, alternative differentials must be considered and thoroughly investigated with CT investigation and a colonoscopy. Overall, the literature suggests that an interval appendectomy should be considered and we would recommend a thorough discussion with the patient to avoid future recurrences.
1.
Buckius MT, McGrath B, Monk J, Grim R, Bell T, Ahuja V. Changing epidemiology of acute appendicitis in the United States: Study period 1993–2008. J Surg Res 2012;175(2):185–90. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
2.
Goldberg H, Bachar GN, Majadla R, Yossepowitch O, Baniel J, Ram E. How prevalent is hydronephrosis secondary to acute appendicitis: A cross-sectional study. Isr Med Assoc J 2018;20(3):141–4.
[Pubmed]
3.
Abdul Rashid S, Ab Hamid S, Mohamad Saini S, Muridan R. A rare case of an appendiceal mass masquerading as a pelvic tumour and causing bilateral hydronephrosis. Biomed Imaging Interv J 2012;8(2):e11. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
4.
Khallouk A, Ahallal Y, Ahsaini M, Elfassi MJ, Farih MH. Appendiceal abscess revealed by right renal colic and hydronephrosis. Rev Urol 2011;13(1):53–5.
[Pubmed]
5.
Okur SK, Koca YS, Y?ld?z İ, Barut İ. Right hydronephrosis as a complication of acute appendicitis. Case Rep Emerg Med 2016;2016:3231862. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
6.
Lee HJ, Woo JY, Byun J. Right hydronephrosis as a sign of complicated appendicitis. Eur J Radiol 2020;131:109241. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
7.
Ata TJ, Chouillard EK, Kane A, et al. Appendiceal abscess revealed by ureteral stenosis and hydronephrosis. Asian J Surg 2007;30(3):224–6. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
8.
Deelder JD, Richir MC, Schoorl T, Schreurs WH. How to treat an appendiceal inflammatory mass: Operatively or nonoperatively? J Gastrointest Surg 2014;18(4):641–5. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
9.
Demetrashvili Z, Kenchadze G, Pipia I, et al. Comparison of treatment methods of appendiceal mass and abscess: A prospective Cohort Study. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2019;48:48–52. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
Tedman Cheuk-Yiu Chau - Conception of the work, Design of the work, Acquisition of data, Analysis of data, Drafting the work, Revising the work critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published, Agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Nicholas Wen-Sheng Lee - Analysis of data, Revising the work critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published, Agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
David Dunn - Analysis of data, Revising the work critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published, Agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Guarantor of SubmissionThe corresponding author is the guarantor of submission.
Source of SupportNone
Consent StatementWritten informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this article.
Data AvailabilityAll relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Conflict of InterestAuthors declare no conflict of interest.
Copyright© 2021 Tedman Cheuk-Yiu Chau et al. This article is distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original author(s) and original publisher are properly credited. Please see the copyright policy on the journal website for more information.